The Kashmir issue, one of South Asia’s most enduring and contentious conflicts, remains a focal point of political tension between India and Pakistan. At the heart of this struggle lies Jammu and Kashmir, a region whose control has been fiercely contested since the 1947 partition. Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) remains a pivotal aspect of this dispute, and many believe that India’s reclamation of PoK is the key to resolving the Kashmir issue once and for all. This article delves into why reclaiming PoK is not just a strategic necessity but a potential solution to the Kashmir conflict, examining its historical roots, its implications, and the challenges involved.

Keywords: Kashmir issue, PoK, Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, India-Pakistan conflict, territorial integrity, cross-border terrorism.

Historical Context of the Kashmir Issue

The Kashmir conflict traces its origins to the 1947 partition of British India when the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, under Maharaja Hari Singh, found itself embroiled in a military conflict. With Pakistan backing tribal invaders, the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession, integrating Kashmir into India, which led to the first India-Pakistan war (1947-48). The war culminated in a ceasefire, with the region divided into Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), which includes areas like Gilgit-Baltistan.

Since then, PoK has been a point of friction, with India asserting its claim over the entire region. Pakistan’s continued support for militancy in Jammu and Kashmir, along with PoK’s use as a base for terrorist training camps, has fueled violence, such as the 2025 Pahalgam attack that killed 26 tourists. The revocation of Article 370 in 2019, which integrated Jammu and Kashmir fully into India, has reignited calls for reclaiming PoK as a permanent resolution.

Keywords: Kashmir conflict history, 1947 partition, Instrument of Accession, PoK history.

What is Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK)?

PoK refers to the territories in Jammu and Kashmir that have been under Pakistan’s control since 1948, encompassing roughly 78,114 square kilometers. The region is divided into two administrative areas:

• Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK): A semi-autonomous region with its own government but heavily influenced by Pakistan.
• Gilgit-Baltistan: A strategically vital region bordering China and Afghanistan, rich in natural resources, yet lacking political autonomy.

PoK is home to over 6 million people, predominantly Muslim, who face economic neglect, governance issues, and human rights challenges under Pakistani rule. India’s position remains steadfast that PoK is an integral part of its territory, a stance echoed by leaders such as Home Minister Amit Shah and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Keywords: Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Gilgit-Baltistan, India’s claim on PoK.

Why Reclaiming PoK Could Resolve the Kashmir Issue

Reclaiming PoK is increasingly viewed as a potential resolution to the Kashmir conflict for several key reasons:

1. Restoration of Territorial Integrity

India considers the entire princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, including PoK, to be its sovereign territory based on the 1947 Instrument of Accession. Reclaiming PoK would complete the integration process initiated by the revocation of Article 370, eliminating territorial ambiguity and solidifying India’s historical and legal claim.

2. Elimination of Cross-Border Terrorism

PoK has long been a breeding ground for militant groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, which use the region as a launchpad for attacks in Indian-administered Kashmir. The 2025 Pahalgam attack, tied to Pakistan-based militants, underscores PoK’s role in supporting terrorism. Control over PoK would allow India to dismantle these networks and secure its borders, significantly reducing the violence that has plagued the region.

3. Strategic Control Over Key Regions

PoK’s geographic location—bordering China, Afghanistan, and India—makes it a critical area for regional security. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), passing through Gilgit-Baltistan, strengthens China’s influence in the region, posing a threat to India. Reclaiming PoK would allow India to exert control over this geopolitically important area, counter China’s expansion, and secure vital trade routes.

4. Addressing Human Rights and Governance Issues

The residents of PoK, particularly in Gilgit-Baltistan, face political repression and economic neglect under Pakistani governance. Protests, like those in 2024 over rising wheat prices and power shortages, highlight the growing discontent. Under India’s governance model, with its democratic institutions and development initiatives, PoK’s residents could see a better quality of life, addressing longstanding grievances and fostering stability.

5. Strengthening National Unity

The Kashmir issue has long been a rallying point for separatist movements in Indian-administered Kashmir, often fueled by Pakistan’s narrative. Reclaiming PoK would strengthen India’s resolve, weaken separatist forces, and promote national unity. It would also resonate with the aspirations of many Kashmiris who seek peace and development under Indian administration.

Keywords: PoK reclamation, cross-border terrorism, CPEC, human rights in PoK, India’s territorial claim.

Strategic Implications of Reclaiming PoK

Reclaiming PoK would have far-reaching consequences not only for India and Pakistan but also for the broader region:

1. Military and Diplomatic Escalation

Reclaiming PoK would likely necessitate military action, given Pakistan’s entrenched military presence in the region. The nuclear capabilities of both countries add a layer of complexity, raising the risk of escalation. Diplomatically, India would need to counter Pakistan’s narrative in international forums like the UN while securing support from its allies, including the U.S., Russia, and Israel.

2. Countering China’s Influence

China’s significant investments in PoK through the CPEC project make it a key player in the region. India’s reclamation of PoK would disrupt China’s strategic plans, potentially straining India-China relations. However, it would also strengthen India’s position in the Indo-Pacific, aligning with the Quad’s goals to counter China’s expansionist agenda.

3. Regional Stability

While reclaiming PoK might initially escalate tensions, it holds the potential to stabilize the region in the long term. With the resolution of the Kashmir dispute, a unified Kashmir could focus on development, tourism, and integration, benefiting the entire region.

Keywords: PoK military action, India-China relations, regional stability, Quad alliance.

Challenges to Reclaiming PoK

Despite its potential benefits, the road to reclaiming PoK is fraught with challenges:

1. Military Risks

Pakistan’s military presence, bolstered by Chinese support, makes any operation to reclaim PoK perilous. The difficult terrain of Gilgit-Baltistan, with its mountainous regions, adds logistical challenges. A protracted conflict could drain resources and escalate into a broader war.

2. International Backlash

Pakistan’s allies, particularly China and Turkey, would likely oppose India’s move, leading to potential sanctions or diplomatic isolation. The international community, including neutral powers like the UN, could call for de-escalation, complicating India’s efforts.

3. Local Resistance

While many in PoK express dissatisfaction with Pakistani governance, some might resist Indian control due to cultural or religious differences. Winning over PoK’s residents would require a robust development agenda and inclusive governance.

4. Economic Costs

Reclaiming and integrating PoK would demand substantial financial resources for infrastructure, security, and reconstruction. India would need to balance these costs with domestic economic priorities.

Keywords: PoK military challenges, international backlash, local resistance, economic costs.

Public Sentiment and Political Will

Public sentiment in India strongly supports the reclamation of PoK, as seen in widespread social media campaigns and statements from political leaders. Hashtags like #PoKIsOurs and #KashmirIssue regularly trend, reflecting the growing nationalistic fervor. Leaders like Amit Shah have emphasized PoK as an “inalienable part of India,” and the BJP’s 2019 manifesto committed to pursuing its integration. The 2025 Pahalgam attack has only intensified calls for decisive action.

However, reclaiming PoK would require meticulous planning, international diplomacy, and a comprehensive communication strategy to address Pakistan’s narrative. India’s growing alliances with powers like the U.S., Russia, and Israel, combined with its economic rise, provide a solid foundation for such an endeavor.

Keywords: PoK public sentiment, India’s political will, BJP PoK stance, Pahalgam attack.

Conclusion

Reclaiming Pakistan-occupied Kashmir could indeed be the ultimate solution to the Kashmir issue, restoring India’s territorial integrity, combating terrorism, and securing its strategic interests. By bringing PoK back under Indian administration, India could address the root causes of the conflict and pave the way for lasting peace and development. However, the challenges—military, diplomatic, and economic—are significant and require careful navigation.

As India moves forward with this vision, the eyes of the international community are fixed on the potential resolution of the Kashmir issue through PoK’s reclamation. Such a move could reshape the geopolitical landscape of South Asia, fostering greater stability and prosperity in the region.

For the latest updates on the Kashmir issue and India’s strategic moves, visit Telugu Tone. Follow us on social media for real-time insights and in-depth analyses.